Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection ; 42(10):765-770, 2022.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2315825

ABSTRACT

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of low dose whole-lung irradiation in COVID-19 pneumonia based on the present evidence. Methods All literature related to the application of low dose whole-lung irradiation in COVID-19 pneumonia were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google scholar, Scoupus, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database until May 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature. For the literature that met the inclusion criteria, both data extraction and literature quality evaluation were blinded. Revman 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 5 controlled clinical trials involving 194 patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were detected in the low dose whole-lung irradiation group compared with the best supportive care group for clinical recovery rates, intubation rates, radiographic improvement rates and 28 d-overall survival. Conclusions In patients of COVID-19 pneumonia, low dose whole-lung irradiation conferred no significant benefit to clinical outcomes. Currently, the routine use of low dose whole-lung irradiation for the treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia is not recommended.Copyright © Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co.Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection ; 42(10):765-770, 2022.
Article in Chinese | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2297352

ABSTRACT

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of low dose whole-lung irradiation in COVID-19 pneumonia based on the present evidence. Methods All literature related to the application of low dose whole-lung irradiation in COVID-19 pneumonia were retrieved from Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google scholar, Scoupus, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database until May 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature. For the literature that met the inclusion criteria, both data extraction and literature quality evaluation were blinded. Revman 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 5 controlled clinical trials involving 194 patients met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were detected in the low dose whole-lung irradiation group compared with the best supportive care group for clinical recovery rates, intubation rates, radiographic improvement rates and 28 d-overall survival. Conclusions In patients of COVID-19 pneumonia, low dose whole-lung irradiation conferred no significant benefit to clinical outcomes. Currently, the routine use of low dose whole-lung irradiation for the treatment of moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia is not recommended.Copyright © Chinese Medical Journals Publishing House Co.Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

3.
Thorac Cancer ; 13(22): 3200-3207, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2052169

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The correlation between COVID-19 and RT has not been determined to date and remains a clinical question. The aim of this study was to evaluate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia before, during, and after radiation therapy (RT) regarding the radiation doses, radiation pneumonitis, and surfactant protein levels. METHODS: We evaluated patients diagnosed with COVID-19 before, during, or after RT for the lung between August 2020 and April 2022. In patients with breast cancer, the RT dose to the ipsilateral lung was determined. In all other patients, bilateral lung RT doses were determined. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 after RT were evaluated to determine whether radiation pneumonitis had worsened compared with before RT. The serum levels of the surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D were measured before, during, and after RT. RESULTS: The patients included in the study comprised three men (27.3%) and eight women (72.7%). The primary cancer sites were the breast (n = 7; 63.7%), lung (n = 2; 18.1%), esophagus (n = 1; 9.1%), and tongue (9.1%). COVID-19 was diagnosed before RT in four patients, during RT in two patients, and after RT in five patients. Six (54.5%) patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia. Radiation pneumonitis grade ≥2 was not identified in any patient, and radiation pneumonitis did not worsen after RT in any patient. No rapid increases or decreases in SP-A and SP-D levels occurred after the diagnosis of COVID-19 in all patients regardless of RT timing. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 did not appear to result in lung toxicity and surfactant protein levels did not change dramatically.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein D , Radiation Pneumonitis , Female , Humans , Male , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/epidemiology , Lung/radiation effects , Lung Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein D/blood , Radiation Pneumonitis/epidemiology , Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein A/blood , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy
4.
Radiother Oncol ; 167: 133-142, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1586757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ability of low dose radiotherapy (LDRT) to control the unprecedented cytokine release associated with COVID-19 pathogenesis has been an area of widespread research since the COVID pandemic. It has not been studied adequately whether the anti-inflammatory effect of LDRT provides additional benefit when used concurrently with steroids amongst other standard pharmacologic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 51 RT-PCR positive COVID-19 patients were recruited between November 2020 and July 2021. 34 patients were allotted to receive 0.5 Gy single session LDRT along with standard pharmacologic therapy while 17 patients received standard pharmacologic therapy alone. All had SpO2 <94% on room air, respiratory frequency >24/min and SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio between >89 but <357. All patients underwent a baseline CT scan. They were followed up for 28 days during when serial SF ratio, blood biomarkers (CRP, Serum ferritin, IL-6), Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), repeat CT scan were performed at pre-defined time points. RESULTS: LDRT showed a statistically significant early improvement in oxygenation, an early time to clinical recovery, early hospital discharge and better radiological resolution compared to control group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to ALC or blood biomarkers at any of the measured time points. The 28-day mortality rate did not show statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: LDRT can be considered for selected oxygen-dependent moderate to severe COVID-19 patients for rapid relief of respiratory distress. It can be safely combined with standard pharmacologic treatment in such patients for added clinical benefit.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Med Radiat Sci ; 68(4): 396-406, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1366249

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality thus far. Considering the historical uses of high-voltage X-ray beams for unresolvable pneumonia, we aimed to assess whether low-dose whole-lung irradiation (WLI) could provide any benefits for patients with refractory COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: Eleven patients with refractory COVID-19 pneumonia were treated with WLI to a total dose of 1 Gy and compared to 11 patients in a matched control group from June to November 2020. The study's primary endpoint was improvement of chest X-ray severity score (CXRS), followed by changes in mean oxygen (O2) saturation and 28-day mortality as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The final CXRS was significantly lower in the WLI group (8.7 ± 2.5) compared to the control group (12.3 ± 3.3) (P: 0.016). Change of CXRS from the first to the last chest X-ray was -2.2 ± 3.1 for the WLI group and 0.7 ± 3.9 for the control group, which showed a trend for lower CXRS in the WLI group (U = 30, p: 0.085). Mean O2 saturation showed insignificant improvement in the first 24 hours after radiotherapy (mean difference: 2.5 ± 4.1, Z=-1.6, P value: 0.11). Overall survival after 28 days was 32% in the WLI group and 11% in the control group (P: 0.48). The reason for death in many patients was not merely respiratory failure, but also other adverse situations like pneumothorax, cardiogenic shock and pulmonary thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose WLI could improve the CXR severity score and O2 saturation in severely ill COVID-19 patients, but larger studies are required to determine its impact on mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Lung , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
6.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 197(11): 1010-1020, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1298545

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lung low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) for pneumonia in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria comprised patients with COVID-19-related moderate-severe pneumonia warranting hospitalization with supplemental O2 and not candidates for admission to the intensive care unit because of comorbidities or general status. All patients received single lung dose of 0.5 Gy. Respiratory and systemic inflammatory parameters were evaluated before irradiation, at 24 h and 1 week after LD-RT. Primary endpoint was increased in the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) or the pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2) to fractional inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio of at least 20% at 24 h with respect to the preirradiation value. RESULTS: Between June and November 2020, 36 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and a mean age of 84 years were enrolled. Seventeen were women and 19 were men and all of them had comorbidities. All patients had bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on chest X­ray. All patients received dexamethasone treatment. Mean SpO2 pretreatment value was 94.28% and the SpO2/FiO2 ratio varied from 255 mm Hg to 283 mm Hg at 24 h and to 381 mm Hg at 1 week, respectively. In those who survived (23/36, 64%), a significant improvement was observed in the percentage of lung involvement in the CT scan at 1 week after LD-RT. No adverse effects related to radiation treatment have been reported. CONCLUSIONS: LD-RT appears to be a feasible and safe option in a population with COVID-19 bilateral interstitial pneumonia in the presence of significant comorbidities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Cause of Death , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Female , Ferritins/blood , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , L-Lactate Dehydrogenase/blood , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung/radiation effects , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnostic imaging , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/radiotherapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Male , Oxygen/blood , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Partial Pressure , Prospective Studies , Radiotherapy Dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
7.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 97(2): 120-125, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-915824

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recently, low dose radiotherapy delivered to the whole lung has been proposed as treatment for the pneumonia due to COVID-19. Although there is biological plausibility for its use, the evidence supporting its effectiveness is scarce, and the risks associated with it may be significant. Thus, based on a virtual case simulation, we estimated the risks of radiation-induced cancer (RIC) and cardiac disease. METHODS: Lifetime attributable risks (LAR) of RIC were calculated for the lung, liver, esophagus, and breast of female patients. The cardiovascular risk of exposure-induced death (REID) due to ischemic heart disease was also calculated. The doses received by the organs involved in the treatment were obtained from a simulation of conformal radiotherapy (RT) treatment, delivering a dose of 0.5 Gy-1.5 Gy to the lungs. We considered a LAR and REID <1% as acceptable, 1-2% cautionary, and >2% unacceptable. RESULTS: The lung was at the highest risk for RIC (absolute LAR below 5200 cases/100,000 and 2250 cases/100,000 for women and men, respectively). For women, the breast had the second-highest LAR, especially for young women. The liver and esophagus had LARs below 700/100,000 for both sexes, with a higher incidence of esophageal cancer in women and liver cancer in men. Regarding the LAR cutoff, we observed an unacceptable or cautionary LAR for lung cancer in all women and men <60 years with an RT dose >1 Gy. LAR for lung cancer with an RT dose of 1 Gy was cautionary for women >60 years of age and men <40 years of age. No LAR estimation was unacceptable for the RT dose ≤0.7 Gy in all groups irrespective of sex or age at exposure. Only 0.5 Gy had an acceptable REID. CONCLUSIONS: A RT dose ≤0.5 Gy provides an acceptable LAR estimate (≤1%) for RIC and REID, irrespective of sex and age. The current ongoing trials should initially use doses ≤0.5 Gy to maintain the risks at an acceptable level and include only patients who fail or do not have any other treatment option.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/radiotherapy , Lung/radiation effects , Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Radiation Dosage , Female , Humans , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , User-Computer Interface
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL